By BY-BKA 
The petition argued that the popular messaging app was not fully adhering to India’s regulatory framework, sparking concerns over user privacy and data security. However, the court ruled in favor of WhatsApp, deciding not to proceed with a ban.
This decision provides some relief to millions of WhatsApp users in India, where the app is an essential communication tool for both personal and business interactions. The case also highlighted the ongoing debate around privacy laws and digital compliance in India, underscoring the importance of maintaining a balance between innovation and regulatory oversight.
Key Takeaways:
The Supreme Court dismissed the PIL seeking a WhatsApp ban for alleged non-compliance with Indian regulations.
The court’s ruling emphasized the need to carefully assess regulatory requirements for tech platforms without disrupting user access.
This verdict brings relief to WhatsApp users in India, where the app plays a crucial role in daily communication.
This update will keep WhatsApp users and tech industry observers engaged with the latest developments in India’s digital privacy and compliance landscape.
In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Kerala resident Omanakuttan KG, a software engineer, seeking a ban on WhatsApp for alleged non-compliance with Indian government regulations. The case was heard by a Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and Aravind Kumar, who stated they were not inclined to entertain the plea.
Omanakuttan’s petition argued that WhatsApp’s refusal to comply with the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, posed a risk to user privacy and national security. The PIL claimed that WhatsApp’s non-compliance violated citizens’ fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which protects personal liberty and privacy.
The petitioner expressed concerns that if WhatsApp does not adjust its technology and cooperate with government regulations, it should not be allowed to operate in India. He cited past instances where the government had banned websites and apps that were deemed a threat to national security.
Key Highlights:
The Supreme Court dismissed a plea to ban WhatsApp, filed by software engineer Omanakuttan KG, citing WhatsApp’s alleged failure to comply with Indian IT regulations.
The PIL raised concerns about privacy and national security, suggesting that WhatsApp’s actions may infringe upon citizens’ rights under Article 21.
The plea emphasized that apps not cooperating with government policies should face operational restrictions in the country.
This ruling is significant for millions of WhatsApp users in India, underlining the ongoing debate about balancing privacy rights with regulatory compliance and national security in the digital age.